Uso clínico de lidocaína intravenosa para manejo de dolor neuropático no oncológico en adultos / Clinical Use of Intravenous Lidocaine for Management of non-Oncologic Neuropathic Pain in Adults

El dolor neuropático es común en la práctica clínica. Se estima que afecta entre el 2 y 3 % de la población a nivel global. Una cantidad considerable de pacientes presentan dolor refractario a tratamientos existentes, volviéndolo un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico. El objetivo de este estudio es describir el uso clínico de lidocaína intravenosa para manejo de dolor neuropático no oncológico en adultos. La búsqueda de información se realizó consultando las bases de datos HINARI, SciELO y PubMed. Se seleccionaron artículos en inglés y español de 2017 a 2021. Se utilizaron artículos originales, ensayos clínicos, revisiones bibliográficas y metaanálisis. Las causas de dolor neuropático en las que ha sido utilizada la lidocaína son la neuralgia posherpética, neuropatía diabética y neuralgia del trigémino. El uso de lidocaína intravenosa demostró que disminuye la intensidad del dolor; sin embargo, al compararlo con otros fármacos de primera línea no hay diferencias a largo plazo. La mayoría de efectos secundarios se presentan en el sistema nervioso, gastrointestinal y cardiovascular. La lidocaína intravenosa como monoterapia para manejo de dolor neuropático no oncológico, si bien fue eficaz a corto plazo con dosis de 3-5 mg/Kg, no tuvo un efecto persistente y duradero

Neuropathic pain is common in clinical practice; it is estimated that 2 to 3 % of the global population is affected; a considerable number of patients present pain refractory to existing treatments, making it a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical use of intravenous lidocaine for the management of non-cancer neuropathic pain in adults. The information search was performed by consulting the HINARI, SciELO and PubMed databases. Articles with an obsolescence of no more than five years, both in English and Spanish, were selected. Original articles, clinical trials, bibliographic reviews and meta-analyses were used. The causes of neuropathic pain in which lidocaine has been used were postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic neuropathy, and trigeminal neuralgia. The use of intravenous lidocaine has been shown to decrease pain intensity; however, when compared with other first line drugs, there are no long-term differences. Most side effects occur in the nervous, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular systems. Intravenous lidocaine as monotherapy for the management of non-cancer neuropathic pain, although effective in the short term with doses of 3-5 mg/Kg, does not have a persistent and long-lasting effect

Lidocaína en infusión transoperatoria para control de dolor: un estudio aleatorizado / Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine pain control: a randomized study

Resumen: Introducción: contar con una analgesia efectiva en el postoperatorio es fundamental para evitar complicaciones asociadas a dolor, en pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica. Objetivos: evaluar la efectividad de la lidocaína en infusión transoperatoria para el control de dolor postoperatorio en pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio experimental, aleatorizado, ciego simple, en pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital General Regional No. 1 en Obregón. Se dividieron en dos grupos de forma aleatoria, al grupo L se le aplicó lidocaína 1.5 mg/k en infusión, al grupo P se le aplicó placebo. Se realizó un análisis estadístico en SPSS v. 22 y se consideró significativa una p < 0.05. Resultados: se observó un adecuado manejo del dolor en los pacientes del grupo L a su ingreso a la Unidad de Recuperación Postanestésica (URPA) (p = 0.002), menor consumo de fentanyl transoperatorio sin diferencia estadística contra placebo (p = 0.086), menor uso de analgesia de rescate postquirúrgica (p = 0.045). Conclusiones: la infusión de lidocaína es efectiva para el manejo del dolor postquirúrgico inmediato, así como disminución de consumo de opioides y dosis de rescate analgésico, con una baja incidencia de náuseas y vómito, pero se asoció a hipotensión transoperatoria.

Abstract: Introduction: having an effective analgesia in the postoperative period is essential to avoid complications associated with pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Objectives: test the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain in cholecystectomized patients by laparoscopy. Material and methods: an experimental, randomized, single-blind study was carried out in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the No. 1 Regional General Hospital in Obregon, Sonora. They were divided into two groups randomly: group L to whom we applied lidocaine 1.5 mg/k in infusion and group P to whom placebo was applied. A statistical analysis was performed in SPSS v. 22 and a p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: adequate pain management was observed in patients of group L upon admission to PACU (p = 0.002), lower consumption of transoperative fentanyl without statistical difference against placebo (p = 0.086), lower use of post-surgical rescue analgesia (p = 0.045), but higher incidence of adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia (p = 0.024). Conclusions: the infusion of lidocaine is effective for the management of immediate postsurgical pain; as well it decreases opioid consumption and analgesic rescue dose, with a low incidence of nausea and vomiting, but associated with hypotension after surgery.

Use of intravenous lidocaine in a patient with refractory chest pain secondary to Takayasu arteritis. Case report / Uso da lidocaína endovenosa em paciente com dor torácica refratária secundária à arterite de Takayasu. Relato de caso

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Takayasu's arteritis (TA) is a rare form of chronic inflammatory disease involving large vessels, with uncertain etiology, with chest pain as a common and challenging symptom, resulting from inflammation in the aortic root or arch, pulmonary artery or coronary arteries. The objective of this study was to describe the use of intravenous lidocaine to treat severe and refractory chest pain secondary to TA. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old female patient diagnosed with TA, with severe chest pain that was difficult to manage, was admitted after consulting an emergency department. The pain was unresponsive to traditional treatment after a week of drug adjustments. As a therapeutic option, a Sympathetic Venous Blockade (SVB) with lidocaine was chosen, achieving a reduction in pain from 10 to 3 on the Visual Analog Scale. Infliximab was administered before discharge. The patient was re-evaluated at an outpatient appointment after 30 days. CONCLUSION: This strategy for the treatment of severe chest pain allowed for pain reduction and relief.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A arterite de Takayasu (AT) é uma forma rara de doença inflamatória crônica envolvendo grandes vasos, com etiologia incerta, tendo a dor torácica como um sintoma comum e desafiador, consequente à inflamação na raiz ou arco aórtico, artéria pulmonar ou coronárias. O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar a utilização da lidocaína por via endovenosa na abordagem da dor torácica intensa e refratária secundária à AT. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente do sexo feminino, 33 anos, com diagnóstico de AT, dor torácica intensa de difícil manejo, internada após consulta em serviço de emergência. Dor não responsiva ao tratamento tradicional após uma semana de ajustes em fármacos. Como opção terapêutica, foi escolhido o Bloqueio Simpático Venoso (BSV) com lidocaína, obtendo redução da dor de 10 para 3 na Escala Analógica Visual. Antes da alta hospitalar foi administrado infliximabe. Paciente foi reavaliada em consulta ambulatorial após 30 dias. CONCLUSÃO: Esta estratégia fora tratamento da dor torácica intensa permitiu redução e alívio da dor.

Lidocaína para el alivio del dolor en pacientes de cuidados paliativos, una serie de casos / Lidocaine for pain relief in palliative care patients, a case series

Introducción. El dolor neuropático afecta al 2 % de la población y 15 de cada 100 pacientes que acuden a consulta médica, sufren de dolor neuropático. Este tipo de dolor es muy común en pacientes con cáncer. Objetivo. Determinar si el uso de lidocaína en infusión endovenosa disminuye el dolor neuropático en los cuidados paliativos con tratamiento opioide. Metodología. Serie de casos de tres pacientes en cuidados paliativos que presentaron dolor neuropático y se les administraron múltiples infusiones de lidocaína intravenosa como coadyuvante para el manejo del dolor, se describieron las dosis utilizadas, el número de infusiones, se evaluó la mejoría del dolor a través de la escala visual análoga y se monitorizaron los posibles efectos secundarios. Resultados. Caso 1: escala visual análoga al ingreso 9/10; 24 horas posinfusión de lidocaína: 4/10. Caso 2: escala visual análoga al ingreso 6/10; 24 horas posinfusión de lidocaína 2/10. Caso 3: escala visual análoga al ingreso 8/10; 24 horas posinfusión 2/10. Conclusión. La infusión intravenosa de lidocaína al 2 % disminuyó el dolor neuropático en los tres pacientes del estudio, sin embargo, el alivio fue transitorio y el efecto positivo se perdió con el paso del tiempo

Introduction. Neuropathic pain affects 2 % of the population and 15 out of 100 patients who go to a physician suffer from neuropathic pain. This type of pain is common in cancer patients. Objective. To determine if the use of lidocaine in intravenous infusion reduces neuropathic pain in palliative care with opioid treatment. Methodology. Case series of three patients in palliative care who presented neuropathic pain and underwent multiple infusions of intravenous lidocaine as an adjuvant for pain management; the doses used and the number of infusions were described, pain improvement was evaluated through the visual analog scale and possible side effects were monitored. Results. Case 1: visual analogue scale on admission 9/10; 24 hours post lidocaine infusion: 4/10. Case 2: visual analogue scale on admission 6/10; 24 hours post lidocaine infusion 2/10. Case 3: visual analogue scale on admission 8/10; 24 hours post-infusion 2/10. Conclusion.Intravenous infusion of 2 % lidocaine reduced neuropathic pain in the three patients of the study, however, the relief is transitory, and the positive effect is lost over time.

Lidocaine 5% patch in the treatment of localized neuropathic pain due to nerve compression. Case reports / Emplastro de lidocaína a 5% no tratamento da dor neuropática localizada por compressão nervosa. Relato de casos

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition with a significant burden for patients, society, and healthcare systems. Due to neuropathic complexity, its management must be different than the one for nociceptive pain. First-line systemic treatments may be associated with dose-dependent adverse events and drug-drug interactions. On the other hand, topical treatments have less systemic adverse events, with the 5% lidocaine transdermal patch being recommended for firstor second line of treatment for neuropathic pain according to various international guidelines. The aim of this study is to present three cases of localized neuropathic pain due to nerve compression managed with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch. CASE REPORTS: The cases of three adult patients (>40 years old) with pain or tingling for a long period of time and their outcomes with treatment with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch for a prolonged duration were investigated. All three cases report a significant improvement in pain. CONCLUSION: The results of the reported cases revealed that a 5% lidocaine transdermal patch represents an effective, safe and tolerable and noninvasive option for the management of localized neuropathic pain due to peripheric nerve compression.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor neuropática é uma condição crônica com impactos significativos para o paciente, a sociedade e o sistema de saúde. Pela sua complexidade neuropática, a sua abordagem deve ser diferente da dor nociceptiva. Os tratamentos sistêmicos de primeira linha para a dor neuropática podem estar associados à incidência de eventos adversos dose-dependentes e interações farmacológicas. Por outro lado, os fármacos tópicos apresentam menor incidência de eventos adversos sistêmicos, sendo o emplastro de lidocaína a 5% recomendado como primeira ou segunda linha de tratamento para essa condição em diversos guidelines internacionais. O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar três casos clínicos de dor neuropática localizada por compressão nervosa manejados com o emplastro de lidocaína a 5%. RELATO DOS CASOS: Três pacientes com idade superior a 40 anos e queixas de dor ou parestesia de longa duração foram manejados com emplastro de lidocaína a 5% em tratamento prolongado, com melhora da intensidade de dor expressiva. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados dos casos reportados revelaram que o emplastro de lidocaína a 5% se apresentou como uma opção terapêutica eficaz, segura, bem tolerada e não invasiva no manejo da dor neuropática localizada por compressão nervosa periférica.

Use of 5% lidocaine patch in the management of post-traumatic localized neuropathic pain. Case reports / O uso do emplastro de lidocaína a 5% no manejo de dor neuropática localizada pós-traumática. Relato de casos

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neuropathic pain is defined as a pain caused by a lesion or condition that affects the somatosensory nervous system. Taking its prevalence into account, in particular post-traumatic localized neuropathic pain, and to discuss ways to manage patients with this condition, considering efficacy and tolerability of proposed treatments, this report presents three clinical cases of patients with post-traumatic localized neuropathic pain treated with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch in both monotherapy and polytherapy. CASE REPORTS: This study reports the cases of three female patients aged between 29 and 81 years with complaints of pain due to trauma, who were managed with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch in prolonged treatment, with a significant improvement in pain. CONCLUSION: According to scientific evidence, the use of 5% lidocaine transdermal patch in post-traumatic localized neuropathic pain as shown efficacy with favorable safety and tolerance. Moreover, it was possible to demonstrate that a 5% lidocaine transdermal patch in a polytherapy format has contributed to improved outcomes with no effect in treatment tolerability.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor neuropática é definida como uma dor provocada por uma lesão ou doença que afeta o sistema nervoso somatossensitivo. Considerando a sua prevalência, em particular dor neuropática localizada pós-traumática, com o intuito de discutir formas de manejar os pacientes portadores dessa condição e avaliando tanto a eficácia quanto a tolerabilidade aos tratamentos propostos, este artigo apresenta três casos clínicos de pacientes portadores dessa condição, tratados com emplastro de lidocaína a 5%, tanto em monoterapia quanto no contexto da terapia multimodal. RELATOS DOS CASOS: Este estudo relata três casos de pacientes do sexo feminino com idades entre 29 e 81 anos e queixas de dor decorrente de trauma, que foram manejadas com emplastro de lidocaína a 5% em tratamento prolongado, com uma significativa melhora do nível de dor. CONCLUSÃO: Em concordância com as evidências da literatura científica, o uso do emplastro de lidocaína a 5% nos casos de dor neuropática localizada pós-traumática relatados mostrou-se eficaz no manejo dessa condição e apresentou perfil de segurança e tolerabilidade favorável. Além disso, foi possível observar também que o emplastro de lidocaína a 5%, quando adicionado em abordagem multimodal, contribuiu para uma melhora no quadro sem prejuízo da tolerabilidade do tratamento.

Cambios Hemodinámicos Asociados a Exodoncias de Terceros Molares Inferiores con el Uso de Articaína 4 % y/o Lidocaína 2 %: Una revisión sistemática / Hemodynamic Changes Associated with Lower Third Molar Extractions with the Use of Articaine 4 % and/or Lidocaine 2 %: A systematic Review

La exodoncia de los terceros molares inferiores es uno de los procedimientos clínicos más comunes en el cual el control del dolor mediante el bloqueo anestésico del nervio alveolar inferior, bucal y lingual resulta ser fundament al y la manera más común de hacerlo es mediante la infiltración de soluciones de anestesia local. Entre ellos la lidocaína y articaína son algunos de los más comunes y pueden estar asociado a vasoconstrictores como la epinefrina que puede provocar aumento de la presión arterial y frecuencia cardíaca razón por la cual se hace necesario la monitorización de cambios hemodinámicos durante la cirugía. Describir los cambios hemodinámicos asociados al uso de lidocaína al 2 % y/ o articaína al 4 % en la presión sistólica y diastólica, frecuencia cardiaca y saturación parcial de oxígeno en relación a distintos tiempos operatorios. Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos de PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science y Sciencedirect. Se analizaron 7 ensayos clínicos controlados en los que utilizaron articaína al 4 % y/o lidocaína al 2 % con epinefrina al 1:100,000 y/o 1:200,000 en volúmenes de 1,8 a 5,4 mL, en los cuales evaluaron la presión sistólica y diastólica, frecuencia cardiaca y saturación parcial de oxígeno en distintos tiempos de la cirugía. Si bien hubo cambios en PAS, PAD, FC y SPO2, todas se mantuvieron dentro de rangos normales bajo el uso de articaína al 4 % y lidocaína al 2 % con epinefrina 1:100,000 y/o 1:200,000 a volúmenes de 1,8 a 5,4mL medidas a distintos tiempos operatorios.

The extraction of lower third molars is one of the most common clinical procedures in which pain control through anesthetic blockade of the lower alveolar, buccal and lingual nerves turns out to be essential and the most common way to do it is through the infiltration of solutions of local anesthesia. Among them, lidocaine and articaine are some of the most common and may be associated with vasoconstrictors such as epinephrine, which can cause an increase in blood pressure and heart rate, which is why it is necessary to monitor hemodynamic changes during surgery. To describe the hemodynamic changes associated with the use of 2 % lidocaine and/or 4 % articaine in systolic and diastolic pressure, heart rate and partial oxygen saturation in relation to different operative times. A systematic review was carried out in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Sciencedirect databases. Seven controlled clinical trials were analyzed in which 4 % articaine and/or 2 % lidocaine were used with epinephrine at 1:100,000 and/or 1:200,000 in volumes of 1,8 to 5,4 mL, in which systolic pressure was evaluated. and diastolic, heart rate and partial oxygen saturation at different times of surgery. Although there were changes in SBP, DBP, HR and SPO2, all remained within normal ranges under the use of 4 % articaine and 2 % lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and/or 1:200,000 at volumes of 1,8 to 5 .4mL measured at different operative times.

Menor aerolización con bloqueo del nervio laríngeo superior comparado con lidocaína intravenosa a la extubación / Less aerolization with superior laryngeal nerve block compared to intravenous lidocaine at extubation

Resumen: Introducción: La tos es una respuesta fisiológica de protección de la vía aérea, produce aerosoles que se identifican por imagen y alcanza una velocidad de hasta ocho metros por segundo. La extubación produce tos, hipertensión, taquicardia, apnea y laringoespasmo, existen métodos para minimizar su aparición. Debido a la pandemia de COVID-19 se han utilizado como profilaxis del reflejo tusígeno, la lidocaína intravenosa y el bloqueo del nervio laríngeo superior. El objetivo fue compararlos en la inhibición de la tos. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron pacientes entre 18-60 años, cirugía electiva con anestesia general balanceada, ASA 1-3, con intubación menor a tres horas. Se aleatorizó un total de 90 pacientes, 45 en cada grupo, se eliminó un total de 10 pacientes por presentar inestabilidad hemodinámica al final de la cirugía o por no administrar dosis intravenosa de lidocaína en el tiempo establecido. Resultados: No hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa en el número de pacientes que presentaron tos en ambos grupos (13 vs 10, p = 0.4684), de éstos se obtuvo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en el número de decibeles a favor del grupo de bloqueo (75.6 vs 67, p < 0.001). Conclusiones: El bloqueo (selectivo) presenta menos aerolización que la lidocaína intravenosa en la extubación.

Abstract: Introduction: Coughing is a physiological response to protect the airway, it produces aerosols that are identified by imaging reaching a speed of up to 8 meters per second. Extubation produces cough, hypertension, tachycardia, apnea and laryngospasm, there are methods to minimize its occurrence. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, intravenous lidocaine and superior laryngeal nerve block have been used as cough reflex prophylaxis. The aim was to compare them in cough inhibition. Material and methods: Patients aged 18-60 years, elective surgery with balanced general anesthesia, ASA 1-3, with intubation less than 3 hours, were selected. A total of 90 patients were randomized, 45 in each group. A total of 10 patients were eliminated because they presented hemodynamic instability at the end of surgery, and because the intravenous dose of lidocaine was not administered within the established time. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients who presented cough in both groups (13 vs 10, p = 0.4684), of these there was a statistically significant difference in the number of decibels in favor of the block group (75.6 vs 67, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Block presents less aerolization than intravenous lidocaine in extubation.

Management of airway obstruction following lidocaine nebulization in a case of tracheal stenosis: case report

Abstract Stenting for lower tracheal stenosis is a tricky situation and for the safe conduct of anesthesia, it is imperative to maintain spontaneous respiration. Airway topicalization is routinely recommended for anticipated difficult airway. We report a case of upper airway obstruction following lidocaine nebulization in a patient to be taken for tracheal stenting for lower tracheal stenosis. We would like to highlight that close monitoring of the patient is advisable during airway topicalization to detect any airway obstruction at the earliest and how fiberoptic intubation can play a pivotal role to secure the airway in an emergency scenario.

Analgesic efficacy of Intraoperative lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing thyroidectomy

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: A significant proportion of patients may experience moderate pain requiring treatment in the postoperative first 24 h following thyroidectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the evaluation of postoperative patient-reported pain from intraoperative intravenous infusion of lidocaine in patients undergoing thyroidectomy surgery. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classifications I and II, aged 18-65 years, who were scheduled for elective thyroidectomy with the same indications under general anesthesia at the Ataturk University Medical Faculty's Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic between November 2019 and February 2020, were divided into two equal groups as randomized and double-blind. Before induction of anesthesia, patients in the lidocaine group were given 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine IV bolus infusion during the operation and until the end of the first postoperative hour, followed by a continuous infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h. Patients in the control group were given 0.9% isotonic solution according to the same protocol. In the postoperative period, 50 mg of dexketoprofen trometamol was administered and repeated every 12 h. Postoperative pain scores, additional analgesia, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the lidocaine group (n=20) compared to the control group (n=20) at 30 min and 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th h postoperatively (p < 0.05). Additional analgesia requirements were also significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommended the use of intravenous lidocaine infusion intraoperatively in thyroidectomy surgery as it reduces pain scores.

Peritumoral infiltration of local anesthetic before surgery in early breast cancer: a comment

This is a comment on a study recently published about peritumoral infiltration of local anesthetic before surgery in early breast cancer. Previously, animal models and a randomized study for stage IV breast cancer patients inferred that the removal of the primary tumor resulted in increased growth factors and worse distant disease control. Therefore, breast cancer surgery might not be a strictly local intervention. In this new randomized study, the intervention was a peritumoral infiltration of local anesthetic ­ lidocaine 0.5% in the six tumor margins, as an attempt to limit the systemic repercussions of surgery. Although the adjuvant treatment available for the study seems outdated, leading us to question the external validation, limited resources may have increased the power of surgery. Unknown mechanisms during surgery can change the patient's journey, and it is our duty to look at surgical studies with due seriousness

A prospective, comparative study of the analgesic effect between the WALANT technique and local anesthesia associated with sedation for hand surgery

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to compare the WALANT (wide awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet) technique with local anesthesia associated with sedation in relation to pain intensity for minor hand surgical procedures. The secondary objective was to evaluate the need for analgesic complementation. Methods: A prospective, randomized, comparative, and clinical study was carried out. The sample size in each group was determined after statistical evaluation of the results of a pilot project. The participants were allocated to one of two groups; those in group 1 were submitted to the WALANT technique, and those in group 2, to local anesthesia associated with sedation, for elective surgery. The surgical procedures were carpal tunnel syndrome, De Quervain's tenosynovitis, synovial cyst, finger cyst, and trigger finger. Pain intensity, need for complementation and evolution to complex regional pain syndrome were evaluated. Results: There was no difference between groups in pain intensity after WALANT and need for intraoperative complementation. There was no significant difference in the amount of opioid applied postoperatively between the groups. There was no difference between groups regarding comfort during surgery. There was no difference in adverse effects and complications between the groups. Hematoma was the most frequent adverse event. No severe adverse events were observed. Conclusions: The WALANT technique promoted an analgesic effect similar to that of local anesthesia associated with sedation, without increasing adverse effects.

Satisfaction de la prise en charge de la douleur après césarienne au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Gynécologie Obstétrique Befelatanana, Madagascar / Satisfaction of the pain management after caesarean section at the Befelatanana University Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Madagascar

L'évaluation de la satisfaction des patientes est une composante essentielle de l'amélioration de la qualité des services en anesthésie. Notre objectif était de déterminer les bénéfices/risques de la Lidocaïne par rapport à la gestion de la douleur post-césarienne et son coût dans le but d'améliorer la prise en charge des patientes douloureuses. Méthodes : Nous avons procédé à une d'une étude prospective comparative randomisée sur une période de dix mois au sein du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gynécologie Obstétrique de Befelatanana. La population d'étude a concerné les femmes opérées pour césarienne sous rachianesthésie. Nous avons évalué la douleur avec la règle EVA (0 à 100 mm) à H1, H2, H3, H4, H8, H12 postopératoire. Résultats : Nous avons inclus 40 patientes pour le groupe A avec Lidocaïne, et 40 patientes pour le groupe B sans Lidocaïne. L'intensité moyenne de la douleur à H12 postopératoire, est de 17,6 ± 11,5 mm pour le groupe A et 29,1 ± 7,4 mm pour le groupe B, avec une différence statistique significative entre les deux groupes (p = 0,008). Conclusion : L'infiltration pariétale de Lidocaïne en peropératoire, pour la prise en charge de la douleur post-césarienne, est bénéfique, comparée au traitement standard seul

Scorpion venom component: AGAP exhibits local anaesthetic effects and attenuates nociceptive pain

The incidences of systemic toxicity and other complications associated with existing local anaesthetics can occur at clinical concentration level and vary with the anaesthetic techniques, types of surgery and patient factors. This evidence suggests the need for therapeutic interventions in peripheral and regional anaesthesia. Buthus martensii Karsch (BmK) scorpion venom is a compound that contains mixtures of peptides that have analgesic properties. This study aimed to investigate the local anaesthetic activity of scorpion venom peptide, AGAP (analgesic-antitumor peptide) in mechanical hyperalgesia or acute inflammatory pain. Method: Formalin was injected into the left hind paw after 20 minutes of infiltration of drugs. The time of licking or flinching of the injected hind paw was recorded as indicative of nociceptive or acute inflammatory pain. Paw flinching or quick withdrawal was considered a positive response to pain in the partial sciatic nerve ligation. The paw-withdrawal threshold (PWT) was determined by consecutively increasing and decreasing the magnitude of the stimulus. Results: The results indicated that AGAP exhibited a 67.9% inhibition in licking or flinching time and an 88.1% inhibition in paw withdrawal in mechanical hyperalgesia. The addition of AGAP to lidocaine showed an 89.5% inhibition in paw withdrawal. Conclusion: The data presented in this study suggest that local infiltration of AGAP significantly reduced mechanical hyperalgesia and acute inflammatory pain

Clinical effect of Kangfuxin solution combined with lidocaine and gentamicin in the treatment of oral ulcer / 药学实践杂志

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of Kangfuxin solution combined with lidocaine and gentamicin in the treatment of oral ulcers. Method A total of 120 patients with oral ulcer admitted to Tongzhou District Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Beijing from May 2019 to July 2021 were selected and divided into observation group and control group randomly. 58 patients were treated with lidocaine as a control group and 62 patients in the observation group were treated with Kangfuxin solution combined with lidocaine and gentamicin. The clinical efficacy, including oral ulcer condition, visual analogue scale (VAS score) after 3d and 5d of treatment, inflammatory factor levels and adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results The overall effective rate of the treatment group (95.12%) was higher than that of the control group (74.36%) and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The ulcer area, ulcer healing time, and chewing improvement period were remarkably reduced compared with those in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS scores after 3d and 5d of treatment, the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions (3.22%) between the observation group and the control group (6.90%) (P>0.05). Conclusion Kangfuxin solution combined with lidocaine and gentamicin showed better curative effect on oral ulcer. This treatment regimen could effectively ameliorate various clinical symptoms of patients with oral ulcer, reduce patient pain and downregulate the levels of inflammatory factors, and help patients recover with high safety profile.

Efficacy of low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of penile hypersensitive premature ejaculation / 现代泌尿外科杂志

【Objective】 To investigate the efficacy of low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of penile hypersensitive premature ejaculation. 【Methods】 A total of 66 patients treated during Nov.2021 and Aug.2022 were randomly divided into electrical stimulation group (n=22), local anesthesia group (n=21), and combined therapy group (n=23). The electrical stimulation group received low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation, 5 times a week;the local anesthesia group used compound lidocaine cream 30 minutes before sexual intercourse;the combined therapy group received both treatments. After 3-month treatment, the latency of dorsal nerve somatosensory evoked potential (DNSEP), glans penis somatosensory evoked potential (GPSEP), intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), premature ejaculation diagnostic tool score (PEDT), and spouse sexual satisfaction score were collected. 【Results】 After treatment, IELT, PEDT, spouse’s sexual life satisfaction score, DNSEP and GPSEP of the three groups were significantly improved (P0.05). 【Conclusion】 Low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation is effective in the treatment of penile hypersensitive premature ejaculation, and the combination of local anesthetics is more effective, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Effect of lidocaine on dose-effect relationship of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion in elderly patients / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effect of lidocaine on the dose-effect relationship of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion in elderly patients.Methods:American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱelderly patients of either sex, aged 65-80 yr, with body mass index of 18-28 kg/m 2, undergoing painless gastroscopy under general anesthesia, were divided into 2 groups using a random number table method: remimazolam group (group C) and lidocaine combined with remimazolam group (group L). Alfentanil 6 μg/kg was given at anesthesia induction in all the patients, and then lidocaine 2 mg/kg was intravenously injected in the patients in group L. Modified Dixon′s up-and-down method was used for the study. Remimazolam was intravenously injected at a dose of 0.18 mg/kg in the first patient, and the gastroscope was placed when the eyelash reflex disappeared and the modified observational alertness/sedation assessment score ≤3. Gastroscope insertion response was defined as swallowing, bucking, body movement and other responses affecting the quality of examination during the gastroscope insertion. The dose of remimazolam was increased/decreased by 0.02 mg/kg in the next patient if the gastroscope response was positive or negative, and the process was repeated until 9 turning points occurred. The median effective dose (ED 50) and 95% confidence interval ( CI) of remimazolam were calculated by probit method. Results:The ED 50 (95% CI) of remidazolam in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion in elderly patients when combined with alfentanil was 0.158 (0.133-0.183) mg/kg in group C. The ED 50 (95% CI) of remidazolam in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion in elderly patients when combined with fentanyl was 0.139 (0.127-0.151) mg/kg in group L. The ED 50 was significantly lower in group L than in group C ( P=0.003). Conclusions:Intravenous lidocaine in combination with alfentanil increases the efficacy of remimazolam for painless gastroscopy in elderly patients.

Effect of intravenous infusion of lidocaine on pulmonary gas exchange function during acute lung injury in septic rats / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effect of intravenous infusion of lidocaine on pulmonary gas exchange function during acute lung injury in septic rats.Methods:Thirty clean-grade healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 2-3 months, weighing 220-280 g, were divided into 3 groups ( n=10 each) using a random number table method: control group (C group), sepsis group (S group) and lidocaine group (L group). Model of acute lung injury in septic rats was prepared by intraperitoneal injection of LPS 10 mg/kg in S and L groups, the equal volume of normal saline was injected in group C, lidocaine was injected at a loading dose of 10 mg/kg via the tail vein at 1 min after LPS injection and then continuously infused for 3 h at a rate of 10 mg·kg -1·h -1, and the equal volume of normal saline was given instead in C and S groups. Rats were sacrificed at 24 h after LPS injection, blood samples from the abdominal aorta were collected for blood gas analysis, and the oxygenation index (OI), alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (A-aDO 2) and respiratory index (RI) were calculated. Then the chest was immediately opened, and the left lung tissues were then immediately removed to determine the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). The right upper lung tissues were removed for microscopic examination of the alveolar structure and pulmonary edema with a light microscope. The right lower lung tissues were also removed to observe the vascular endothelial structure with a transmission electron microscope. Results:Compared with group C, the levels of A-aDO 2, RI, TNF-α, HO-1 and ROS were significantly increased, the PaO 2 and OI were decreased ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in PaCO 2 in group S and group L ( P>0.05). Compared with group S, the PaO 2, OI and HO-1 were significantly increased, the levels of A-aDO 2, RI, TNF-α and ROS were decreased ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in PaCO 2 levels in group L ( P>0.05). The pathological damages of the lung tissues were significantly attenuated in group L when compared with group S. Conclusions:Intravenous infusion of lidocaine can improve pulmonary gas exchange function during acute lung injury in septic rats.

The therapeutic efficacy of compound lidocaine cream on psoriasis / 药学学报

Psoriasis is a non-infectious chronic inflammatory skin disease. It′s acknowledged that interleukin (IL)-17 signaling pathway dominantly drives the development of psoriasis. Recently, the role of neuro-immune axis in psoriasis has attracted widespread attention. Lidocaine, a local anesthetic, has ability to block the conduction of nerve impulses, while its therapeutic efficacy on psoriasis remains to be confirmed. Here, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of topical application of compound lidocaine cream (LIDO) on imiquimod (IMQ)-induced mouse psoriasis model. Animal welfare and experimental procedures follow the regulations of the Ethics Committee of China Pharmaceutical University. The psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) scoring was used to evaluate the severity of psoriasis-like symptoms. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was used to examine histopathological changes and epidermal thickness was measured. Ki67 immunofluorescence staining was used to evaluate the proliferation of keratinocytes. The relative mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines (including Il17, Il22, Il23 and Il36) in skin was measured by real-time quantitative PCR. Results show that IMQ-induced increases in the PASI score, epidermal thickness, number of Ki67+ cells and the mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines are significantly alleviated by topical application of LIDO, whose therapeutic efficacy is also better than that of the positive control drug calcipotriol. Our study suggests that LIDO could be used for psoriasis treatment.

Favorable Safety Experience of Local Dental Anesthesia in ICD Recipients with Cardiac Channelopathies

Abstract Background Dental anesthetic management in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients with cardiac channelopathies (CCh) can be challenging due to the potential risk of life-threatening arrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies during procedural time. Objectives The present study assessed the hypothesis that the use of local dental anesthesia with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or without a vasoconstrictor can be safe in selected ICD and CCh patients, not resulting in life-threatening events (LTE). Methods Restorative dental treatment under local dental anesthesia was made in two sessions, with a wash-out period of 7 days (cross-over trial), conducting with a 28h - Holter monitoring, and 12-lead electrocardiography, digital sphygmomanometry, and anxiety scale assessments in 3 time periods. Statistical analysis carried out the paired Student's t test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In all cases, a significance level of 5% was adopted. All patients were in stable condition with no recent events before dental care. Results Twenty-four consecutive procedures were performed in 12 patients (9 women, 3 men) with CCh and ICD: 7 (58.3%) had long QT syndrome (LQTS), 4 (33.3%) Brugada syndrome (BrS), and 1 (8.3%) Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). Holter analysis showed no increased heart rate (HR) or sustained arrhythmias. Blood pressure (BP), electrocardiographic changes and anxiety measurement showed no statistically significant differences. No LTE occurred during dental treatment, regardless of the type of anesthesia. Conclusion Lidocaine administration, with or without epinephrine, can be safely used in selected CCh-ICD patients without LTE. These preliminary findings need to be confirmed in a larger population with ICD and CCh.